Loading...

Impact of herbicides on transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) under an integrated rice–fish–poultry farming system


Citation :- Impact of herbicides on transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) under an integrated rice–fish–poultry farming system . Res. Crop. 26: 415-420
M. SUBISHAN, S. VISHNUDEVI, A. SUNDARI AND G. BARADHAN subishanm@gmail.com
Address : Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Annamalai UniversityAnnamalai Nagar-608002, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India
Submitted Date : 14-08-2025
Accepted Date : 28-08-2025

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) sustains over half the global population, but weed competition remains a major constraint, causing 20–60% yield losses. Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAT is increasingly impractical due to labour scarcity and cost, highlighting the need for effective weed management strategies within integrated farming systems to enhance productivity, profitability, and sustainability. Based on this, a field study was established to determine the influence of herbicides in an integrated Rice + Fish + Poultry operation with regard to the growth and yield parameters of transplanted rice. The study compared unweeded control, hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAT, azolla @ 1 t/ha, and pre-emergence applications of Butachlor (1.25 kg a.i./ha), Metsulfuron-methyl + Chlorimuron-ethyl (20 g a.i./ha), Pretilachlor + Bensulfuron-methyl (660 g a.i./ha), and Pretilachlor + Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl (615 g a.i./ha) at 3 DAT. Of the treatments evaluated, those with a pre-emergent application of pretilachlor (6%) in combination with bensulfuron-methyl (0.6%GR) @ 660 g a.i./ha on 3 DAT (T6) performed the best in terms of yield of grains along with higher yields of meat derived from fish and poultry components. The study concluded that establishing a Rice + Fish + Poultry system and using the pretilachlor + bensulfuron-methyl herbicides, at the recommended rate, will yield better and provide greater economic benefits to the farmers growing rice, fish, and poultry.

Keywords

Food security herbicides integrated farming system rice weed management

References

Balaji, E., Raman, R., Krishnamoorthy, R. and Dhanasekaran, K. (2024). Evaluation of different weed management practices on growth and yield of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Northeastern Zone of Tamil Nadu. Crop Res. 59: 8-13.
Behera, U. K. and France, J. (2023). Farming systems research: Concepts, design and methodology. Adv. Agron. 177: 1-49. doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2022.08.001.
Chakraborty, P., Chopra, A. and Contractor, L. (2024). The equilibrium impact of agricultural support prices and input subsidies. Economics Discussion Paper. pp. 123.
Gharde, Y., Singh, P. K., Dubey, R. P. and Gupta, P. K. (2018). Assessment of yield and economic losses in agriculture due to weeds in India. Crop Prot. 107: 12-18.
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley and Sons.
Gupta, R. K., Ghosh. P., Aparna, M., Bharti, R. and Pramanik, K. (2023). Efficacy and selectivity of different herbicides on the transplanted late boro rice under the lateritic soil of West Bengal. IJBSM 14: 1133-40. doi:10.23910/1.2023.3579a.
Kathiresan, R. and Vishnudevi, S. (2021). Rice farming components for biological weed control in transplanted rice: perspective on weedy rice management. Weed Sci. 69: 609-14.
Kathiresan, R., Vishnudevi, S. and Jayakanth, U. V. (2020). Impact of agro-input use in integrated rice (Oryza sativa L.) farming system. Indian J. Agron. 65: 151-55.
Mir, M. S., Naikoo, N. B., Amin, Z., Bhat, T. A., Nazir, A., Kanth, R. H. and Rehman, U. (2022). Integrated farming system: A tool for doubling farmer’s income. J. Exp. Agric. Int. 44: 47-56.
Patra, M., Behura, A. K., Sar, K. and Prusty, A. A. (2023). Influence of nitrogen and weed management practices on productivity of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Trop. Agric. 61: 91-96.
Pervaiz, R., Baloch, R., Arshad, M. A., Abbas, R. N., Shahzad, N., Hamid, M., Batool, Z., Maqbool, M. S., Masih, A., Salam, A. and Akbar, M. M. (2024). Herbicide strategies for weed control in rice cultivation: Current practices and future directions. Haya: Saudi J. Life Sci. 9: 114-29. doi:10.36348/sjls.2024.v09i04.004.
Raj, B. G. (2023).  Response of direct seeded rice under different formulation of new generation herbicides M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu, India.
Raj, S. K. and Syriac, E. K. (2017). Weed management in direct seeded rice: a review. Agric. Rev. 38: doi:10.18805/ag.v0iOF.7307.
Singh, T., Satapathy, B. S., Gautam, P., Lal, B., Kumar, U., Saikia, K. and Pun, K. B. (2018). Comparative efficacy of herbicides in weed control and enhancement of productivity and profitability of rice. Exp. Agric. 54: 363-81.
Suganya, R. (2024). Effect of chemical weed management on growth, yield and economics of drum seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J. Agron. 69: doi:10.59797/ija.v69i3.5517.
Umiyati, U., Widayat, D., Wahyudin, A. and Triazahra, M. M. (2024). Impact of 240 g/L glyphosate IPA on weed control and upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth and yield in a no-tillage system. Res. Crop. 25: 379-87.
Yadav, T. K., Singh, S. P. and Singh, M. K. (2022). Influence of nitrogen levels and weed management practices on soil quality of wetland rice. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 34: 394-400.

Global Footprints