Loading...

Phenotypic stability, yield and grain quality in promising genotypes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in the central highlands of Peru


Citation :- Phenotypic stability, yield and grain quality in promising genotypes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in the central highlands of Peru. Crop Res. 61: 202-209
DIEGO VERA-MAYOR, DORIS MARMOLEJO-GUTARRA AND RICHARD PEÑALOZA dmarmolejo@uncp.edu.pe
Address : Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Mariscal Castilla 3909, Huancayo, 12006, Peru
Submitted Date : 30-12-2025
Accepted Date : 3-02-2026

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is a strategic Andean crop due to its high nutritional value and adaptability to marginal environments; however, grain yield and quality are often constrained by genotype × environment interaction (GEI), increasing production risk for farmers. Identifying genotypes that combine high yield, phenotypic stability, and low saponin content is therefore essential for varietal improvement and recommendation in heterogeneous agroecological conditions. During the 2022–2023 agricultural season, three promising quinoa genotypes (CQH-3, CQH-52, and CQH-19) and a local control (Hualhuas) were evaluated at three representative locations of the Mantaro Valley, central highlands of Peru. Grain yield and saponin content were assessed using a randomised complete block design. Yield data were subjected to combined analysis of variance across locations, and phenotypic stability was determined using the Eberhart and Russell regression model. Significant GEI (p ≤ 0.05) confirmed differential genotype responses across environments, justifying stability analysis. Genotype CQH-3 exhibited the highest mean grain yield (2829 kg/ha) and a near-ideal stability profile (bi = 1.041; Sdi² = −0.234), indicating broad adaptability and predictable performance. All evaluated INIA-UNCP genotypes were classified as sweet quinoa, with saponin contents ranging from 0.028% to 0.043%, markedly lower than the bitter local control (0.211%). The combined evaluation of productivity, stability, and grain quality identified CQH-3 as an elite candidate for commercial release in the central highlands of Peru.

Keywords

Adaptability interaction quinoa saponin stability yield

References

Alania-Choque, J., Vásquez-Espinoza, L. G., Anculle-Arenas, A., Bustamante-Muñoz, J. L., Jellen, E. N., Gutiérrez-Rosales, R. O. and Mayta-Anio, M. E. (2024). Characterization and agronomic evaluation of quinoa accessions in the Peruvian coastal desert. Agronomy 14: doi:10.3390/agronomy14091908.
Al-Naggar, A. M., Younis, A. S. M., Atta, M., El-Moneim, M. and Al-Metwally, M. (2022). Stability of quinoa genotypes under different nitrogen sources using AMMI and GGE biplot models. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. 23: 1–20.
Anchico-Jojoa, W., Peixoto, J. R. and Oliveira-Júnior, A. A. (2023). Agronomic characterization and genotype by environment interaction of quinoa in Brazil and Colombia. Hortic. Bras. 41: doi:10.1590/s0102-0536-2023-e2629. 
Eberhart, S. A. and Russell, W. A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36–40.
Estrada-Zúniga, R., Apaza-Mamani, V., Pérez-Ávila, A. A., Altamirano-Pérez, A. M., Neyra-Valdez, E. and Bobadilla, L. G. (2022). Comportamiento agronómico de 81 genotipos de quinua en el Perú. Ecosist. Recur. Agropecu. 9doi:10.19136/era.a9n1. 3134.
Hinojosa, L., Leguizamo, A., Carpio, C., Muñoz, D., Mestanza, C., Ochoa, J. et. al. and Murphy, K. (2021). Quinoa in Ecuador: recent advances under global expansion. Plants 10: doi:10.3390/plants10020298.
Hlásná Cepková, P., Dostalíková, L., Viehmannová, I., Jágr, M. and Janovská, D. (2022). Diversity of quinoa genetic resources for sustainable production: nutritive characteristics as influenced by environmental conditions. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6: doi:10.3389/fsufs.2022.960159.
Jokarfard, V., Rabiei, B., Laki, E. S. and Börner, A. (2024). Stability and adaptability of grain yield in quinoa genotypes across four locations of Iran. Front. Plant Sci. 15: doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1487106.
Khaitov, B., Karimov, A. A., Toderich, K., Sultanova, Z., Mamadrahimov, A., Allanov, K. and Islamov, S. (2020). Adaptation, grain yield and nutritional characteristics of quinoa genotypes in marginal environments of the Aral Sea basin. J. Plant Nutr. 44: 1365-79. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1862200.
Koziol, M. J. (1991). Afrosimetric estimation of threshold saponin concentration for bitterness in quinoa. J. Sci. Food Agric. 54: 211–19.
Laki, E. S., Rabiei, B., Jokarfard, V., Miyangaskari, M. S., Marashi, H. and Börner, A. (2025). Evaluation of genotype × environment interactions in quinoa genotypes. Agriculture 15: doi:10.3390/agriculture15050515.
Lozano-Isla, F., Apaza, J. D., Mujica Sanchez, A., Blas Sevillano, R., Haussmann, B. I. G. and Schmid, K. (2023). Enhancing quinoa cultivation in the Andean highlands of Peru: a breeding strategy for improved yield and early maturity. Euphytica 219doi:10.1007/s10681-023-03155-8.
Maiti, R. K. and Singh, V. P. (2019). A review on research advances in ethnobotany and pharmacognosy of some medicinal plants†. Farm. Manage. 4: 45-52.
Manjarres Hernández, E. H., Morillo Coronado, A. C., Cárdenas Chaparro, A. and Merchán López, C. (2022). Yield, phenology and triterpene saponins in Colombian quinoa. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6: doi:10.3389/fsufs.2022.919885.
Mestanza Uquillas, C. A., Coronel Rivera, J. A., Véliz Zamora, D. V. and Vásconez Montúfar, G. H. (2023). Contenido de saponina y proteína en genotipos de quinua producidos en la costa central del Ecuador. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Quim. Farm. 52: 1–10.
Nguyen, V. L., Luu, H. N., Phan, T. H. N., Nguyen, V. L., Chu, D. H., Bertero, D. Curti, N., Peter C. McKeown, P. C. and Spillane, C. (2024). Genotype by environment interaction across water regimes in relation to cropping season response of quinoa. PLoS One 19: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309777.
Olguín, P., Contreras, S., Rojas, C. and Fuentes, F. (2025). Genotype-by-environment interaction stability analysis of new quinoa varieties in the Mediterranean zone of Chile. Plants 14: doi:10.3390/plants14193007.
Pandya, A., Thiele, B., Zurita-Silva, A., Usadel, B. and Fiorani, F. (2021). Determination and metabolite profiling of triterpenoid saponins from Chilean quinoa germplasm. Agronomy 11: doi:10.3390/agronomy11091867.
Pathan, S., Ndunguru, G., Clark, K. and Ayele, A. G. (2023). Yield and nutritional responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes under irrigated, rainfed and drought-stress environments. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 7doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023. 1242187.
Thiam, E., Allaoui, A. and Benlhabib, O. (2021). Quinoa productivity and stability evaluation through varietal and environmental interaction. Plants 10doi:10.3390/plants10040714.
Triguero, C., Almanza, G. R., Tarqui, S. and Lozano, M. (2024). Quantification of saponins by GC/MS in quinoa genotypes from the southern highlands of Bolivia. Rev. Bol. Quim. 41: 1–10.
Valeri, M., Roberto, M. and Dmitriev B. (2022). Determination of physiological maturity of four quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) varieties for introduction in the Russian Federation. Res. Crop. 23: 307-12.
Valverde-Ramos, M. G., Espitia-Rangel, E., Miranda-Colín, S. and Benítez-Riquelme, I. (2022). Evaluation of quinoa germplasm in environments of the central high-valley lands of Mexico. Agrociencia 56: 1–12.

 
 

Global Footprints