Loading...

Impact of Rabi maize-legume intercropping system on growth, yield and crop competition in maize 


Citation :- Impact of Rabi maize-legume intercropping system on growth, yield and crop competition in maize. Res. Crop. 25: 409-415
SAGAR MAITRA, SOUVIK SAIN, MASINA SAIRAM, TANMOY SHANKAR, SUMIT RAY, MAHUA BANERJEE AND G. C. MALIK sairam.masina@cutm.ac.in
Address : Department of Agronomy and Agroforestry, M. S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Paralakhemundi-761211, Odisha, India
Submitted Date : 21-06-2024
Accepted Date : 16-07-2024

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is the third most important cereal crop after rice and wheat which is considered a soil-exhaustive crop. The combination of soil exhaustive and replenishing crops in a cropping system is a beneficial approach where legumes can play a vital role in agricultural sustainability. As maize is a widely spaced crop, intercropping legumes can easily be adopted. Based on these facts, an experiment was conducted at P. G. Research Farm of Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha during two consecutive Rabi seasons of 2021-22 and 2022-23 where chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and field pea (Pisum sativum L.) were intercropped with hybrid maize by adopting different planting geometry. The mean data of two years revealed that sole maize uniform row (UR) being statistically at par with sole maize paired row recorded the higher plant height and dry matter accumulation of maize than intercropped maize. Sole maize also recorded higher values of yield attributes of maize, namely, number of cobs/plants, number of grains/row and number of rows/cobs which was reflected in the grain yield of maize. Due to inter-species competition, grain yield of maize was reduced in the mixed stand where uniform row sole maize registered the highest grain yield (5857 and 6101 kg/ha, respectively during both years) and it was closely followed by paired row sole maize (5789 and 6005 kg/ha, respectively). Grain and stover yields of legumes, such as chickpea and field pea were higher in pure stand because of its optimum plant stand and devoid of inter-species competition. Moreover, the benefits of the intercropping systems were pronounced in all the intercropping systems laid out in an additive series in terms of land equivalent ratio, relative crowding coefficient, area time equivalent ratio, competitive ratio, maize equivalent yield and monetary advantage. The study revealed that intercropping maize UR + chickpea (1:2) resulted in the highest values of net return and benefit-cost ratio which can be recommended for South Odisha conditions.

Keywords

Agricultural sustainability chickpea economics field pea maize mixed stand

References

Bhuiyan, M. M. R., Monshi, F. I., Begum, M., Tabassum, R., Hoque, M., Islam, S. S. and Hasan, A. K. (2021). Maize-chickpea intercropping under diverse tillage systems enhance the productivity and economic returns. World J. Agric. Sci. 17: 509-20.
Biruk, G., Awoke, T. and Anteneh, T. (2021). Effect of intercropping of maize and cowpea on the yield, land productivity and profitability of components crops in Bena-Tsemay Woreda, Southern Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. Res. Innova. Technol. 11: 147-50.
De Wit, C. T. (1960). On competition. Agricultural Research Report No. 66.8, PUDOC, Wageningen. pp. 82.
Dhar, P. C., Awal. M. A., Sultan. M. S., Rana. M. M. and Sarker. A. (2013). Interspecific competition, growth and productivity of maize and pea in intercropping mixture. J. Crop Sci. 2: 136-43.
Dharshini, P. A., Kumble, A. A., Harishmadevi, M., Jagadeesh, P., Kaviya, R., Mugesh, A., Sharmitha, S., Vimala, V., Theradimani, M. and Jeyajothi, R. (2019). Relative performance of growth and yield of maize based cropping system. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 7: 3163-66.
FAOSTAT (2021). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Data: Crops and Livestock Products, available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed 29th August 2023).
Gitari, H. I., Nyawade, S. O., Kamau. S., Karanja. N. N., Gachene, C. K., Raza, M. A., Maitra, S. and Schulte-Geldermann, E. (2020). Revisiting intercropping indices with respect to potato-legume intercropping systems. Field Crop Res. 258: doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107957.
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd Edn.). John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 680.
GoO (2020). 5-decades of Odisha agriculture statistics. Directorate of Agriculture and Food Production, Government of Odisha, India. pp. 46.
Hall, R. L. (1974a). An analysis of the nature of interface between plants of different species. I. Concepts and extension of the Dewit analysis to examine effects. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 25: 739-47.
Hall, R. L. (1974b). Analysis of the nature of interface between plants of different species. II. Nutrient relations in a Nandi Setaria and green leaf Desmodium association with particular reference to potassium. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 25: 749-56.
ICAR-IIMR (2019-20). Director’s report: ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, PAU Campus, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Javanmard, A., Machiani, M. A., Lithourgidis, A., Morshedloo, M. R. and Ostadi, A. (2020). Intercropping of maize with legumes: A cleaner strategy for improving the quantity and quality of forage. Cleaner Engg. Technol. 1: doi:10.1016/j.clet.2020.100003.
Khan, M. A. H., Sultana, N., Akter N, Zaman, M. S. and Islam, M. R. (2018). Intercropping garden pea (Pisium sativum) with maize (Zea mays) at farmers’ field. Bangladesh J Agric. Res. 43: 691-702.
Maitra, S. (2018). Role of Intercropping System in Agricultural Sustainability.  Centurion J. Multidisc. Res.  8: 77-90.
Maitra, S. (2020). Intercropping of small millets for agricultural sustainability in drylands: A review. Crop Res. 55: 162-71.
Maitra, S. and Ray, D. P. (2019). Enrichment of biodiversity, influence in microbial population dynamics of soil and nutrient utilization in cereal-legume intercropping systems: A Review. Int. J. Biores. Sci. 6: 11-19.
Maitra, S., Hossain, A., Brestic, M., Skalicky, M., Ondrisik, P., Gitari, H. I., Brahmachari, K., Shankar, T., Bhadra, P., Palai, J. B., Jana, J., Bhattacharya, U., Duvvada, S. K., Lalichetti, S. and Sairam, M. (2021).  Intercropping–A low input agricultural strategy for food and environmental security. Agronomy 11: doi:10.3390/agronomy11020343.
Maitra, S., Sahoo, U., Sairam, M., Gitari, H. I., Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., Battaglia, M. L. and Hossain, A. (2023). Cultivating sustainability: A comprehensive review on intercropping in a changing climate. Res. Crop. 24: 702-15. doi:10.31830/2348-7542.2023.roc-1020.
Maitra, S., Sairam, M., Kalasare, R. K., Gaikwad, D. J., Venkata Raghava, C., Gopala Krishna, T. and Sahoo, U. (2024). Role of legume based intercropping system in soil health improvement. In: Sairam, M., Santosh, D. T., Gaikwad, D. J., Maitra, S. (Eds.), Advances in Modern Agricultural Practices. pp. 41-61.
Maitra, S., Shankar, T., Manasa, P. and Sairam, M. (2019). Present status and future prospects of maize cultivation in south Odisha. Int. J. Biores. Sci. 6: 27-33.
Manasa, P., Maitra, S. and Barman, S. (2020). Yield attributes, yield, competitive ability and economics of summer maize-legume intercropping system. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol. 13: 33-38.
Manasa, P., Maitra, S. and Reddy, M. D. (2018). Effect of summer maize-legume intercropping system on growth, productivity and competitive ability of crops. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 8: 2871-75.
McGilchrist, C. A. (1965). Analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics 21: 975-85.
Nandi, S., Maitra, S., Shankar, T., Panda, M. and Sairam, M. (2022). Impact of intercropping of vegetable legumes in summer maize on productivity and competitive ability of crops. Crop Res. 57: 122-27.
Panda, S. K., Maitra, S., Panda, P., Shankar, T., Pal, A., Sairam, M. and Praharaj, S. (2021). Productivity and competitive ability of Rabi maize and legumes intercropping system. Crop Res. 56: 98-104.
Panda, S. K., Sairam. M., Sahoo, U., Shankar, T. and Maitra, S. (2022). Growth, productivity and economics of maize as influenced by maize-legume intercropping system. Farm. Manage. 7: 61-66.
Patil, Y. G., Mevada, K. D., Vaghela, G. M. and Bedis, M. R. (2022). Economics, equivalent yield and land equivalent ratio for maize with chickpea intercropping system under middle Gujarat condition. Pharma Innov. J. 11: 1887-90.
Prakash, V., Manimaran, S., Elankavi, S. and Venkatakrishnan, D. (2019). Evaluation of growth attributes and yield of maize + pulse intercropping system. Plant Arch. 19: 3522-24.
Priya, G. S., Maitra, S., Shankar, T. and Sairam, M. (2023) Effect of the summer pearl millet-groundnut intercropping system on the growth, productivity, and competitive ability of crops under South Odisha conditions. Plant Sci. Today 10: 238-46.
Sahoo, U., Maitra, S., Dey, S., Vishnupriya, K. K., Sairam, M. and Sagar, L. (2023). Unveiling the potential of maize-legume intercropping system for agricultural sustainability: A review. Farm Manage 8: 1 ̶ 13.
Sain, S., Maitra, S., Shankar, T. and Sairam, M. (2023). Competitive ability of legume-based intercrop for Rabi maize (Zea mays L.) in north eastern ghats of Odisha. Crop Res. 58: 136-43.
Sairam, M., Maitra, S., Sahoo, U., Sagar, L. and Krishna, T. G. (2023). Evaluation of precision nutrient tools and nutrient optimization in maize (Zea mays L.) for enhancement of growth, productivity and nutrient use efficiency. Res. Crop. 24: 666-77.
Telkar, S. G., Singh, A. K. and Kant, K. (2018). Determination of effective spatial arrangement for intercropping of maize+ soybean using dry matter yield and competition interaction. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem. 7: 2239-45.
Willey, R. W. (1979). Intercropping- Its importance and research needs. I. Competition and yield advantages. II. Research approaches. Field Crop Abst. 32: 2-10.
Willey, R. W. and Osiru, D. S. O. (1972). Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. J. Agric. Sci. 79: 517-29.
Willey, R. W. and Rao, M. R. (1980). A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experiment. Agric. 16:117-25.
 
 

Global Footprints