Loading...

Efficacy of broad-spectrum herbicide mixtures on weed flora in wet direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) in the east coast plain region of India


Citation :- Efficacy of broad-spectrum herbicide mixtures on weed flora in wet direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) in the east coast plain region of India. Res. Crop. 25: 228-234
SUNITA MEHER, SANJOY SAHA, NITISH TIWARI, ASHIRBACHAN MAHAPATRA, JAGADISH JENA AND MINU MOHAN correspondingauthor123@gmail.com
Address : MSSSoA, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Paralakhemundi, Odisha-761211, India
Submitted Date : 24-03-2024
Accepted Date : 17-04-2024

Abstract

Wet direct seeded rice (DSR) attributing floristically diverse weed flora which emerges as main constraints for its successful cultivation. Broad spectrum herbicide mixtures can be acted as weapon for mitigating this issue by nullifying the challenges like weed shift, herbicide resistance etc. Consequently, an experiment was conducted at the Institute Research Farm of ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, situated in the east coast plain region of India specifically in mid-central table land agro-climatic zone of Odisha during the Kharif seasons of 2020 and 2021 to assess the effectiveness of different herbicide mixtures in managing weeds successfully. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design encompassing 12 treatments, viz., nine post-emergence herbicide mixtures (experimental combinations for testing), one post-emergence herbicide check, one weed-free (T11) (weed-free plots were maintained by hand weeding) and one weedy check (T12), replicated thrice. The net plot size was 5.8 × 3.8 m (22.04 m2). The test variety CR Dhan 203 was sown in 20 cm rows apart. Weed-free treatment (T11) was at par with fenoxaprop-p ethyl 6.7% EC (w/w) + ethoxysulfuron 15% WDG (w/w) (50+15) g/ha (T4) , penoxsulam 21.7% SC+ cyhalofop-butyl 12% EC (w/v)  (25+100) g/ha (T3) , azimsulfuron 50% DF+ bispyribac sodium 10% SC (22+25) g/ha (T1), flucetosulfuron 10% WDG (w/w) + bispyribac sodium 10% SC (25+25) g/ha (T2) , bispyribac sodium 10% SC  + ethoxysulfuron 15% WDG (w/w) (25+15) g/ha (T5) for high performance in terms of grain yield. Also showed lowest weed flora dynamics and relative weed density as well. Among the herbicide treatments, fenoxaprop-p ethyl 6.7% EC (w/w) + ethoxysulfuron 15% WDG (w/w) (50+15) g/ha (T4) registered the highest weed control efficiency (86.49%) and lowest weed index (6.69%), hence demonstrating as most viable and adoptable combinations for agricultural crop production.

Keywords

Broad spectrum weed management direct seeded rice herbicide mixtures weed pressure


References

Anonymous (2021). Punjab brings 5.62 lakh hectares under DSR - its highest ever. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/ludhiana/punjab-brings-5-62-lakh-hectares-under-dsr-its-highest-ever-7432636/
Anonymous (2023). Total area of cultivation for rice across India from financial year 2014 to 2021, with an estimate for 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/765691/india-area-of-cultivation-for-rice at the end of fiscal, across the south Asian nation.
Azmi, M., Chin, D. V., Vongsaroj, P. and Johnson D. E. (2005). Emerging issues in weed management of direct seeded rice in Malaysia, Vietnam and Thailand. In: Toriyama, K., Heong, K. L. and Hardy, B. (Eds.) Rice is life: scientific perspectives for the 21st Century. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan. pp. 196-98.
Chaudhary, A., Venkataramana, V., Mishra, A. K. and Sharma, S. (2023). Agronomic and environmental determinants of direct seeded rice in South Asia. Circ. Econ. Sust. 3: 253–90. doi:10.1007/s43615-022-00173-x.
Chauhan, B. S., Kumar, V. and Mahajan, G. (2014). Research needs for improving weed management in rice. Indian J. Weed Sci. 46: 1-13.
Hossain, K., Timsina, J., Johnson, D., Gathala, M. K. and Krupnik, T. J. (2020). Multi-year weed community dynamics and rice yields as influenced by tillage, crop establishment, and weed control: Implications for rice-maize rotations in the eastern Gangetic plains. Crop Prot. 138: doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105334.
Jat, H. S., Kumar, V., Kakraliya, S. K., Abdallah, A. M., Datta, A., Choudhary, M., Gathala, M. K., McDonald, A. J., Jat, M. L. and Sharma, P. C. (2021). Climate-smart agriculture practices influence weed density and diversity in cereal-based agri-food systems of western Indo-Gangetic plains. Sci. Rep. 11: doi:10.1038/s41598-021-95445-1.
Krishnamurthy, E. V., Mahadeva Rao, T. and Subramanian, K. (1975). p-Adic arithmetic procedures for exact matrix computations. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 82: 165-75.
Misra, A. K., Maity, S. B. and Radotra, S. (1997). Nutritive value of stylo (Stylosanthes hamata) straw for sheep. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 14: 59-60.
Mitra, B., Patra, K., Bhattacharya, P. M., Ghosh, A., Chowdhury, A. K., Dhar, T., Islam, S., Laing, A. M. and Gathala, M. K. (2022). Efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicide combinations on weed control in no-till mechanically transplanted rice. Cogent Food Agric. 8: doi:10.1080/23311932.2022.2139794.
Mohanty, S. (2013). Trends in global rice consumption. Rice Today. January- March 2013 issues. pp. 44-45.
Mondal, D., Ghosh, A., Sen, S., Roy, D., Bera, S., Ghosh, R. and Bandopadhyay, P. (2019). Effect of herbicides and their combinations on weeds and productivity of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J. Agron. 64: 464-70.
OECD/FAO (2022). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook, OECD Agriculture statistics (database). https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc6361en. PIB (2023). https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRIDtext=As%20per%20-second%20Advance%20Estimates%20for%202022%2D23%2C%20Total%20Foodgrain,(record)% 201308.37%20lakh%20tonnes.
Raj, S. K., Nimmy, J., Reena, M. and Leenakumary, S. (2013). Chemical management of non-grassy weeds in direct-seeded rice. Indian J. Weed Sci. 45: 159-62.
Saha, S., Munda, S., Singh, S., Kumar, V., Jangde, H. K., Mahapatra, A. and Chauhan, B. S. (2021). Crop establishment and weed control options for sustaining dry direct seeded rice production in eastern India. Agronomy 11: doi:10.3390/ agronomy11020389.
Saravanane, P., Pavithra, M. and Vijayakumar, S. (2021). Weed management in direct seeded rice impact of biotic constraint and its sustainable management options. Indian Farming 71: 60–63.
Sen, S., Kaur, R. and Das, T. K. (2020). Weed management in dry direct-seeded rice: Assessing the impacts on weeds and crop. Indian J. Weed Sci. 52: 169-74. doi:10.5958/0974-8164.2020.00030.1.
Shekhawat, K., Rathore, S. S. and Chauhan, B. S. (2020). Weed management in dry direct-seeded rice: A review on challenges and opportunities for sustainable rice production. Agron. 10: doi:10.3390/agronomy10091264.
Singh, V., Jat, M. L., Ganie, Z. A., Chauhan, B. S. and Gupta, R. K. (2016). Herbicide options for effective weed management in dry direct seeded rice under scented rice-wheat rotation of western Indo Gangetic Plains. Crop Prot. 81: 168-76. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2015.12.021.
Zargar, M., Najafi, H., Fakhri, K., Mafakheri, S. and Sarajuoghi, M. (2011). Agronomic evaluation of mechanical and chemical weed management for reducing use of herbicides in single vs. twin row sugarbeet. Res. on Crops 12: 173-78.

 
 

Global Footprints